Comments on: A 3D Future Without Glasses

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:57:00 +0000

well its been a year since the first comments and technology has advanced somewhat, but we still aren’t there yet. The autostereoscopic TV still needs some tweaking but it does look very promising. Soon enough they’ll have it cracked and then 3D TV will really come into its own. Personally I cannot wait, the immersive experience of 3D really brings entertainment to a new level imo.

Brian from http://3dtvs.org.uk

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:44:00 +0000

Well, it’s a year since the first comments on here and now the technology has advanced somewhat, but it’s still not quite there yet. It still seems they haven’t managed to create a quality 3d experience and that standing at an angle will effectively ruin your viewing experience, as will standing at the wrong distance from the TV. I’m really excited about advancements and can’t wait until the autostereoscopic technology breaks through properly, it will truly be a revolution in the entertainment experience.

Mr.TV at http://3dtvs.org.uk

By: Glasses-Free 3D

Glasses-Free 3D — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 17:18:06 +0000

[...] most common thus far. They are called parallax barrier technology and Lenticular technology. The LG Company explains how each technology works in depth. Besides these two technologies there are other methods [...]

By: Hn_agrvl

Hn_agrvl — Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:46:00 +0000

The possibility of affecting our eyes is quite high in using flickering glasses. It also affect our health due fix position while watching 3D, thus to avoid all these one should look for FPR 3D Glasses which is free from all these problems.

By: Draw_Skt

Draw_Skt — Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:56:00 +0000

I think you should consult with doc. however, Lg claims that their 3d tv glasses are are not effective to eyes and other parts of human body.

By: Bonikhanna

Bonikhanna — Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:45:00 +0000

one of my friend suggest me to purchase LG’s FPR glasses for light weight glass and there’s no angular distortion. I wanna buy LG’s 3d tv still I want a confirmation for my mom because she is suffering from glaucoma.guys is LG’s 3d tv will be best for my mom.

By: Dean Bourne

Dean Bourne — Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:22:40 +0000

This is a great product for the business world but I am a bit sceptical about the real uses at home

By: Ken

Ken — Sun, 27 Jun 2010 20:08:02 +0000

Apologies for possibly over-simplifying things but isn't it easier to film the source material using a specially developed camera layered with a lens array similar to that in Integral Imaging? However, in this array, the lenses are convex, perhaps best likened to hundreds of thousands of tiny 'bubbles' each capturing a number of slightly different angles of the source material. Viewed back on a convential TV screen, this would look like a disorientating mess, but played back through a TV screen 'coated' with exacting lenses akin to the type originally filmed through, the original image is restored. Because each tiny 'bubble' on the TV screen is showing a slightly different image (and because each bubble is so small that a viewer would need a magnifying glass to single out a cluster of them), each eye sees a slightly different image and whether viewed from the left, right, directly in front, or at a higher or lower angle, the result is a comfortable 3D image without the transitional blur of lenticular or parallax technology. As it says in the article, 'just like a fly', but without the difficulty in generating multiple views because the tiny convex lenses will do this without a need for processing power. The main brunt of the processing will be used for storing the 'flattened' 3D image from the camera, which surely isn't much of a problem.

By: 3DGizmo

3DGizmo — Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:41:44 +0000

So, auto-stereoscopic displays have very few "sweet spots" where 3D works, and, if I understand it correctly, the 3D mode can't be turned off because it's caused by a special screen which is part of the TV.

I really don't think that will work for a home TV in a living room. At least with the glasses you can wear them for a special event (movie, sports, games) and then watch Eastenders without glasses on the same TV.

No-one wants 3D forced on them... which glasses-free 3DTV's will do.

Guy
http://www.3DTVreviewer.co.uk/

By: Denis Roy

Denis Roy — Thu, 17 Jun 2010 02:59:03 +0000

the pleasure of watching a movie with a grouop of viewers will be compromised until the holographic process will be ready, but then, the cinematographic rules will again need to be re-written to accomodate that experience closer to the traditionnal theater.